Everything Audentia Research has written about talent mapping, in one place. Plain answers to the questions buyers actually ask — what it is, how it works, what it costs, how it differs from recruitment and sourcing — and a library of 34 articles grouped by topic, not by platform.
We publish on Medium, Substack, Blogspot, Quora and Tumblr so the research reaches people wherever they read. This page is the index to all of it, kept current as new pieces go out.
Last updated
The six questions we are asked most often, answered directly. Each answer links to the articles that go deeper and to the service page on this site.
Talent mapping is the structured research process of identifying and profiling the people who could fill a defined set of roles in a defined market, before a vacancy exists. A talent map records who those people are, which organisations employ them, their function, seniority, location and tenure, and how the teams around them are structured — so hiring and workforce decisions are made against researched evidence rather than against whoever happens to apply.
A project starts with the business question, then agrees the market boundary — roles, industries, locations. Researchers identify the target organisations, profile the relevant people from public sources and open primary research, verify and normalise every record so titles are comparable, analyse the landscape and deliver a structured map with written findings and a briefing.
Cost is driven by scope: the size of the market, the number of target organisations and locations, the depth of research and the deliverables. Audentia Research charges a fixed project fee, agreed in the proposal before work starts — no commission and no percentage of salary, however many hires come from the map.
Recruitment responds to an open vacancy and ends when it is filled. Talent mapping starts from a business question, covers the whole defined market whether or not people are available today, and produces a research asset that keeps its value long after the first hire.
Sourcing looks for people to approach for a specific live role and stops when the pipeline is full. Mapping describes the entire relevant population and the competitor structures around it, so it can inform strategy, workforce planning and many future hires, not just one.
Structured research into how rival organisations are staffed — leadership, team structures, headcount distribution, talent concentrations and hiring activity. It uses publicly available information and open primary research only, never confidential internal information, and it explains why a talent market behaves the way it does.
The gathering, verification and analysis of data about a talent market — people, competitors, skills, rewards and locations — turned into insight a leadership team can act on. Unlike a one-off map, it is designed to stay current and be refreshed on an agreed cadence.
Every piece Audentia Research has published off-site, sorted into eight topics. Filter by platform if you prefer one, or read top to bottom — the topics run roughly from “what is it?” to “how do we buy it?”. All links open the original article in a new tab.
Start here if the term is new. These pieces explain what a talent map is, why it exists, and the most expensive mistake it prevents — hiring against the handful of people who applied instead of against the market.
Read our definitive guide →The core idea in plain language: what a talent map contains, how it differs from a candidate list, and why organisations commission one before they need to hire.
Read on Medium →Our answer on Quora — a practical walk-through written for both in-house hiring teams and recruiters who want to use mapping in their own work.
Read on Quora →The open Quora question itself. Follow it to see how other practitioners define talent mapping, or add your own perspective to the discussion.
Join on Quora →Most recruitment begins when a position opens. This essay argues the real work should begin earlier — understanding the market before the requisition exists.
Read on Quora →A US scenario showing what happens when a company hires without knowing the market — and how much of the cost only shows up months later.
Read on Quora →The method, step by step: defining scope, choosing target organisations, researching and profiling people, and turning findings into a structured report. Most of these are written for the US market, where metro-by-metro differences change the answer.
Talent mapping in the USA →The full process for a US project, from agreeing the business objective to delivering the finished map and briefing.
Read on Medium →How US businesses identify available professionals, read geographic distribution and evaluate competitor organisations before recruiting.
Read on Blogspot →Where qualified professionals concentrate, how competitors structure teams, and how research feeds workforce planning and expansion.
Read on Substack →A short introduction to reading the US talent market before hiring — a quick companion to the longer guides above.
Read on Tumblr →How scaling companies use mapping to plan hiring ahead of growth rather than scrambling once headcount is approved.
Read on Tumblr →What a talent mapping service involves, why competitive US industries rely on it, and what to weigh when selecting a provider.
Read on Blogspot →For buyers. What drives the price of a talent mapping project, and the questions that separate a research firm from a recruiter using mapping as a sales tool.
How Audentia prices projects →The factors that set the fee — market size, number of organisations and metros, research depth and deliverables — and how pricing models compare.
Read on Medium →A short checklist for evaluating providers: methodology, sources, data ownership, pricing model and the quality of the analysis you get back.
Read on Tumblr →Five things to ask any talent mapping provider. Are you paid for the research or for placements? Is the fee fixed before work starts? Which sources do you use — and do you ever use confidential information? Do you normalise job titles against real scope? Who owns the data when the project ends?
At Audentia Research the answers are: the research; yes; public sources and open primary research only, never confidential information; yes; you do, 100%.
The terms get used interchangeably. They are not the same activity, and choosing the wrong one is how budgets get spent on the wrong problem. These pieces draw the lines clearly.
See the comparison table →Where each starts, what each delivers and when a business needs one, the other, or both in sequence.
Read on Medium →Told through the search for a senior finance leader — showing why mapping and recruitment are complementary stages, not competitors.
Read on Quora →Coverage and shelf life: why sourcing stops when the pipeline is full while a map keeps earning across many future hires.
Read on Medium →A five-step view of the research process and how its outputs — structures, titles, skills, talent concentration — differ from a sourcing shortlist.
Read on Blogspot →Most competitor analysis looks at products, pricing and marketing. The people behind those things are just as researchable — ethically, from public sources — and often more revealing about where a rival is heading.
Competitor intelligence service →How researching competitor teams becomes usable intelligence for hiring, organisation design and strategy.
Read on Medium →Analysing competitor workforce structures, leadership teams and industry skills from public information to see the wider US talent landscape.
Read on Substack →A quick case for looking past a competitor’s product to the teams and skills that actually build it.
Read on Tumblr →Why workforce signals — team growth, new functions, leadership moves — belong in competitor analysis alongside price and product.
Read on Quora →A company preparing to expand in the United States, and what knowing its competitors’ talent changes about the expansion plan.
Read on Quora →Mapping the senior leadership field before a search is launched — for succession planning, board-level hiring and understanding who could credibly lead a new function.
Executive search service →Why leadership hiring goes better when the credible field is known before a role is vacant, not after.
Read on Medium →Researching senior roles, organisational structures and leadership backgrounds to support succession, competitive analysis and expansion.
Read on Substack →A concise overview of executive mapping for US organisations planning senior hires or leadership changes.
Read on Tumblr →Where a map is a snapshot, intelligence is the ongoing view: skills availability, competitor movement, geography and reward, refreshed so strategy is not built on last year’s market.
Talent intelligence service →How workforce intelligence and market research support recruitment planning, from skills availability to long-term workforce strategy.
Read on Substack →Using market data on skills, competitor structures and geography to make hiring and planning decisions on evidence.
Read on Blogspot →A short piece on treating hiring as a research question first and a recruitment task second.
Read on Tumblr →Why mapping the whole market, rather than individual candidates, is becoming the starting point for strategic hiring.
Read on Tumblr →How analysis of workforce composition, structure and skills turns raw talent data into decisions US leadership teams can act on.
Read on Tumblr →Combining information on people, organisations, skills and labour markets — and why analysis, not data volume, is what creates insight.
Read on Substack →The UK behaves differently from the US: regional clusters, longer notice periods and deferred compensation all shape who is genuinely available. These guides are written for UK hiring and workforce planning.
Talent mapping in the UK →A practical guide for UK companies researching their talent market before committing to a hiring plan.
Read on Medium →What UK talent mapping services involve and how companies use them to understand the market before they recruit.
Read on Medium →Testing workforce-plan assumptions: defining target populations, identifying organisations, analysing profiles, geography and compensation.
Read on Substack →Five activities that often get confused. The difference is in the question each one answers — and in what you are left holding when it ends.
| Service | Starts with | Covers | You receive | Shelf life |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talent mapping | A business question | The whole defined market, available or not | A structured, verified map of people and competitor structures, with analysis | Months to years; reusable for many hires |
| Talent sourcing | A live role | People who could be approached now | A vetted shortlist | Ends when the role is filled |
| Recruitment | An open vacancy | Applicants and approached candidates | A hire | Ends at placement |
| Executive search | One senior appointment | The credible senior field for that role | An appointed leader | Ends at appointment |
| Talent intelligence | A strategic decision | People, competitors, skills, reward and locations | Ongoing insight and benchmarks | Continuous; refreshed on a cadence |
Short on time? Pick the situation closest to yours and read three pieces in order.
Build the case internally and understand what you would be buying.
Test whether the talent your plan depends on exists, where, and against whom.
Know the credible external field before a senior seat is empty.
Every profile below is run by Audentia Research. Follow the one you already read, and new articles will reach you there first.
Our longest guides: definitions, cost, process, comparisons and the UK and US market guides.
medium.com/@sales_96384 Follow on Medium →Research notes on talent and workforce intelligence, executive and competitor mapping. Subscribe to receive them by email.
audentiaresearch.substack.com Subscribe on Substack →US-focused guides to talent mapping, services, sourcing comparisons and talent intelligence.
audentiagroup.blogspot.com Read the blog →Answers and short essays built around real hiring scenarios. Ask us a question there and we will answer it.
quora.com/profile/Audentia-Research Follow on Quora →Short reads — the quickest way into each topic, from executive mapping to choosing a provider.
tumblr.com/audentiaresearch Follow on Tumblr →Our company profile on Clutch, the B2B services directory: services, focus areas, team size and our London and Mumbai offices. Worked with us? You can leave a review there.
clutch.co/profile/audentia-research View on Clutch →Also on LinkedIn, Facebook and Instagram. For research published on this site, see Insights.
Don’t take our word for it. Audentia Research Private Limited is a registered company, and these independent registries, review sites and business databases list us. Each link opens the third-party page in a new tab.
Audentia Research Private Limited — registered in India, Corporate Identification Number (CIN) U74120MH2013PTC248202, Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) 335800JN9W45ZOQ8MM34.
Third-party pages are maintained by their publishers, not by Audentia Research. For our current contact details, always use this website or sales@audentiaresearch.com.
The vocabulary used across the library, in one consistent set of definitions.
The global service page — talent scans and full maps, sample pages and example projects.
View service →Our definitive on-site guide to the method, the deliverables and when to use it.
Read the guide →What Audentia does, who we serve, the process and what the client receives.
View services →UK market structure, regional talent clusters and the notice-period constraints that shape availability.
View UK page →Metro-by-metro mapping, competitor structures and the equity questions that decide US moves.
View US page →Ongoing, refreshable market insight — competitors, skills, compensation benchmarks and locations.
View service →Our research-led mapping methodology in detail, and how it differs from agency mapping.
Read more →Real projects and real outcomes across mapping, search, pipelining and intelligence.
See the work →Articles, white papers and reports published on audentiaresearch.com.
Read insights →A thirty-minute conversation is usually enough to know whether we can help — and what the right shape of project would be.